Compare options strategies at expiration
This tool compares predefined option structures using available provider snapshots. A common price axis shows how each position would pay off at expiration under the entered market reference. It is a scenario model, not a forecast, broker quote or historical backtest.
How to read the comparison
- Load an underlying symbol. The tool requests up to 250 near-price contracts with expiries at least seven calendar days away. Review the displayed expiry and partial-data notice; the result is not the full listed chain.
- Select up to four strategies. Strikes are selected near fixed template offsets, not optimized for your outlook. Inspect every actual strike, quantity and day-close premium. Missing or incompatible contracts make a strategy unavailable.
- Compare the expiration curves at the same stock price. The chart does not model time value before expiration. A collar includes 100 shares at the loaded stock reference; other templates contain option legs only.
- Read theoretical maximum profit, maximum loss, breakeven boundaries and net cash flow. A positive credit is not profit until the position’s later obligations are accounted for.
What the metrics mean
Each standard option contract represents 100 shares in this model. For a long call, expiration value is the positive part of stock price minus strike; for a long put it is the positive part of strike minus stock price. Subtract the premium for a long leg, reverse the sign for a short leg, and multiply by contract quantity and 100. The collar also adds the stock’s change from the displayed entry basis.
Stock price cannot fall below zero. A long put therefore has a finite maximum profit, while an uncovered short call can have unlimited loss as stock price rises. The model checks zero, each strike and the upper-price tail instead of treating the visible chart range as the whole outcome space.
Return on Risk is the ratio of finite maximum expiry profit to finite maximum expiry loss. It is not an expected or annualized return. No probability of profit is calculated: counting profitable points on an arbitrary chart grid does not create a probability distribution.
Position Greeks sum signed provider estimates across quantities and the 100-share multiplier. Collar delta also includes its 100 shares. Missing Greeks remain unavailable rather than becoming zero. These are local sensitivity estimates from the snapshot, not the slope of every point on the expiration chart.
Direction does not determine the outcome
Bullish and bearish filters describe intended directional exposure, not a promise of profit. Long straddles and strangles require a sufficiently large move to cover premiums; short straddles and strangles carry substantial risk, including unlimited short-call loss. A jade lizard has no net upside loss only when its total credit covers the call-spread width. The displayed premiums determine that condition.
Data and model limits
FMP supplies the stock reference and Massive supplies option snapshots. Premiums here use each contract’s day close, which may be stale or asynchronous across legs. They are not executable bid/ask quotes. Availability depends on provider coverage and access; some contracts or fields are absent.
Results omit commissions, fees, bid/ask spread, slippage, early exercise or assignment, dividends, interest and financing. Standard 100-share contracts are required; other deliverables are not modeled, so verify the contract terms. All modeled legs share one expiry. The tool does not calculate buying power, margin, taxes or an order execution plan.
Sources
- Massive option-chain snapshot fields and pagination
- Options Industry Council: long-put payoff and risk
- Options Industry Council: protective collar
Educational analysis only. Options can involve substantial losses, assignment obligations and losses beyond the initial premium for short positions. A theoretical payoff does not establish suitability or future returns.