Hasbro, Inc. research snapshot

HAS AI Stock Analysis

HAS AI stock analysis currently reads Hasbro as a mixed turnaround story: Wizards of the Coast and Digital Gaming are carrying growth and margins, while Consumer Products remains more cyclical and exposed to retail demand, royalties, tariffs, and brand execution. The analysis favors scenario-based underwriting rather than a single price target because GAAP earnings are still distorted by impairment charges, but free cash flow, gaming demand, and 2026 margin guidance give the bull case real evidence.

Current price

$76.67

Market cap

$10.86 billion

AI score

66 / 100

Rating

Turnaround quality watch, valuation discipline required

Trend status

Fundamental momentum improving, technical trend weak

Data cutoff (updated weekly)

July 8, 2026

Informational use only. This page is not investment advice.

Research quality check

information Richness
A-level information richness. Hasbro is a long-listed U.S. company with SEC filings, company investor releases, segment disclosures, stock data, and third-party financial databases available for cross-checking.
bias Check
The main AI research risk is consensus extrapolation. It is easy to over-weight MAGIC: THE GATHERING growth and under-weight toy-cycle volatility, licensing concentration, retailer inventory timing, and the risk that Universes Beyond demand normalizes.
ai Confidence
High for reported revenue, segment mix, cash, debt, share count, market cap, and technical levels. Medium for normalized EPS valuation because GAAP earnings include impairment noise and future franchise cadence is uncertain.
investment Certainty
Medium-low. The business has a valuable IP library and a high-margin gaming engine, but the thesis depends on execution in Consumer Products and the durability of Wizards growth.

Quick verdict table

DimensionConclusionConfidence
Business qualityHasbro owns durable brands and a strong gaming engine, but the consolidated business is less predictable than a pure software or platform compounder.Medium
MoatThe moat comes from IP, fan communities, retail relationships, and Wizards ecosystems. It is real but uneven across segments.Medium-high
ManagementCEO Chris Cocks has pushed Hasbro toward digital-first play, cost discipline, and Wizards-led growth after leading Wizards before becoming CEO.Medium
Financial trendFY2025 revenue rose 13.7% to $4.70 billion, and Q1 2026 revenue rose 13% to $1.00 billion with operating margin at 27.0%.High
ValuationGAAP PE is not useful while TTM EPS is negative, but P/FCF is about 10.6x and the dividend yield is about 3.6%.Medium
Technical trendHAS trades below its 50-day and 200-day moving averages with oversold RSI readings, so the chart is weak despite improving fundamentals.Medium-high
Risk levelRisks include toy demand cyclicality, license concentration, tariffs, goodwill impairment, debt load, and franchise fatigue.Medium-high
AI confidenceDescriptive confidence is high because filings and market data are available. Return confidence is lower because the turnaround depends on execution and sentiment.High data confidence
Investment certaintyThe stock has upside if normalized earnings hold, but the business quality is not yet as clean as the best consumer or gaming compounders.Medium-low

HAS AI stock forecast

HAS AI Stock Forecast Scenarios

The HAS AI stock forecast should be read as scenario math, not a promise. Using the July 8, 2026 research cutoff, a $76.67 stock price, FY2025 adjusted EPS of $5.54, and a three-year model, the tested range spans a bearish $47 area, a base $103 area, and a bullish $148 area before dividends. The range is wide because GAAP earnings are distorted and the market must decide how durable Wizards-led growth really is.

Bullish case

$135 to $150

More likely if Wizards keeps growing, Consumer Products stabilizes, 2026 adjusted EBITDA lands near or above the $1.40 billion to $1.45 billion outlook, and investors reward normalized earnings with a higher multiple.

Base case

$95 to $105

More likely if revenue grows in the low to mid single digits, adjusted margins hold near guidance, free cash flow remains solid, and the market assigns a mid-teens multiple to normalized EPS.

Bearish case

$45 to $50

More likely if MAGIC growth slows, Consumer Products losses persist, tariff or royalty pressure returns, or debt and impairment concerns keep the multiple compressed.

HAS AI technical analysis

HAS AI Technical Analysis

HAS AI technical analysis is weak even though the fundamental story is improving. As of the July 8, 2026 data cutoff, HAS was near $76.67, below both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with daily technical sources showing oversold momentum rather than confirmed upside trend recovery.

LevelValueWhy it matters
Current price$76.67Markets Insider intraday quote at 12:23 PM on July 7, 2026, used as the latest available market snapshot for this page.
Near support$76.46 to $76.66Investing.com classic S1 and pivot area. A failure here keeps near-term pressure intact.
Deeper support$69.68Markets Insider reported 52-week low. This is a stress reference, not a forecast.
Near resistance$76.93 to $77.40Investing.com classic R1 to R3 pivot band. Reclaiming this area would be the first short-term repair signal.
50-day moving average$81.81 to $88.29Investing.com and StockAnalysis reported different daily 50-day averages. Both sit above spot, so the trend read is still negative.
200-day moving average$84.00 to $86.44Investing.com and StockAnalysis both show HAS below the 200-day average.
MomentumRSI 23.9 to 26.7Oversold daily RSI can support a bounce, but it does not prove a durable reversal by itself.
Volume monitor20-day average volume about 2.0 millionBreakouts should be judged against average volume because low-volume rebounds can fail quickly.
InvalidationClose below $69.68A break of the reported 52-week low would invalidate a mean-reversion thesis and suggest a deeper repricing.

HAS AI trading strategy

HAS AI Trading Strategy Framework

The HAS AI trading strategy below is a research framework for planning risk, not personal investment advice. It combines fundamental confirmation with technical levels because the current chart is weak while the operating turnaround is still visible.

Trend-following setup

Wait for HAS to reclaim the 50-day moving average and hold above the $81 to $88 moving-average zone with improving volume and no negative earnings revision.

Treat a close back below the reclaimed moving average or a failed retest of the breakout level as an invalidation signal.

Mean-reversion setup

If HAS holds the $76 area and RSI remains oversold, compare the bounce attempt with Q2 earnings, Wizards bookings, Consumer Products margin, and management commentary.

Avoid averaging down without a defined stop. A close below the 52-week low at $69.68 changes the setup from mean reversion to trend damage.

Fundamental monitor

Track Wizards revenue, MAGIC demand, total gaming revenue, Consumer Products losses, debt reduction, free cash flow, dividend coverage, tariff exposure, and 2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance.

Do not let a strong IP story replace position sizing. Scenario ranges can move after earnings, product launches, or tariff updates.

Investment research summary

Four-master Research Compression

Business essence

Hasbro sells play, storytelling, and fandom through physical toys, board games, licensed consumer products, tabletop gaming, digital gaming, and entertainment IP. Customers pay because brands such as MAGIC: THE GATHERING, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, Monopoly, Play-Doh, and Transformers create repeatable emotional and social use cases.

Moat

The moat is strongest where IP, rules systems, collectible behavior, organized play, and fan identity reinforce each other. Wizards has better switching costs and community depth than the broader toy portfolio, while Consumer Products faces more retail and substitution pressure.

Munger risk inversion

The thesis fails if Wizards growth proves pull-forward, licensing fatigue hits margins, Consumer Products does not recover, tariffs force price hikes that reduce demand, or debt and impairment concerns keep equity holders from receiving the cash flow upside.

Management

Chris Cocks previously led Wizards and has focused the company on digital-first play, cost transformation, brand concentration, and capital returns. The key question is whether management can revive toys without over-relying on one high-margin segment.

Industry trend

Hasbro sits at the intersection of gaming, collectibles, licensed entertainment, and physical toys. The long-term fan economy helps Wizards, but traditional toy demand remains cyclical and exposed to retailer inventory choices.

Valuation and margin of safety

At about $76.67, GAAP multiples look distorted by losses, while free cash flow yield is near 9.4%. Margin of safety depends on normalized earnings power, debt discipline, and whether the market treats Hasbro as a higher-quality gaming and IP company rather than a slow toy maker.

Source-backed data

HAS Data Table

Every metric below includes a source and last verification date.

MetricValueSourceLast verified
HAS price$76.67Markets Insider quoteJuly 8, 2026
Market cap$10.86 billionStockAnalysis statisticsJuly 8, 2026
Shares outstanding141.49 millionMarkets Insider snapshotJuly 8, 2026
FY2025 revenue$4.701 billionHasbro 2025 Form 10-KJuly 8, 2026
FY2025 adjusted EPS$5.54Hasbro FY2025 results releaseJuly 8, 2026
Q1 2026 revenue$1.000 billion, up 13%Hasbro Q1 2026 results releaseJuly 8, 2026
Q1 2026 Wizards revenue$582.0 million, up 26%Hasbro Q1 2026 results releaseJuly 8, 2026
Cash and debt$1.36 billion cash, $3.87 billion debtStockAnalysis statisticsJuly 8, 2026
TTM free cash flow$1.02 billion, $7.22 per shareStockAnalysis statisticsJuly 8, 2026
Technical trendStrong sell by daily moving averages, RSI oversoldInvesting.com technical analysisJuly 8, 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

This HAS AI stock analysis is an informational research tool only and is not investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell securities. Forecast scenarios are based on available public data, assumptions, and technical snapshots as of the stated cutoff date. They can be wrong, and future results may differ materially.