Does sector flow change the ranking?

No. Optional sector-flow context remains a separate source and never rewrites the price-based ranking.

How many sectors are returned?

Exactly eleven fixed GICS sector ETF proxies are returned, each with explicit coverage.

Can AI predict stock prices with this MCP tool?

No. AI cannot predict stock prices with certainty, and this MCP tool does not promise future returns. It gives an agent bounded data or validation results that still require independent review, risk controls, and source checking.

Agent workflows

Sector Rotation MCP Tool for AI Agents

analyze-sector-rotation evaluates the fixed eleven US GICS sector ETF proxies against SPY. It uses dividend-adjusted 5, 21, and 63 trading-day total and relative returns, SMA50 trend, a fixed 20/50/30 composite, stable ties, and four descriptive phases.

Connect Pineify MCP View all MCP tools

MCP tool nameRead only

analyze-sector-rotation

Example prompt

Use Pineify analyze-sector-rotation for 3m and list all eleven phases with coverage.

Direct answer

What analyze-sector-rotation does

The price-based ranking always contains the same eleven sector definitions. Missing 63-day or benchmark history remains visible rather than changing the universe.

Optional sector-flow context is labeled as options-premium evidence and does not rewrite the price-based ranking or masquerade as ETF fund flows.

Contract

What the agent sends and receives

Inputs

`horizon`: 1m or 3m; optional and defaults to 3m.
`detail`: compact or standard.
No custom ETF basket, weight, benchmark, date, or provider selector is accepted.

Structured output

`sector-rotation-v1` structured content.
Exactly eleven sector records with ranking, phase, adjusted returns, trend, coverage, and as-of.
SPY benchmark, phase groups, optional sector-flow context, warnings, and methodology.

Capabilities

Where this MCP tool fits

Use a fixed sector universe

Keeps the eleven GICS/SPDR proxies and SPY benchmark versioned and deterministic.

Compare three horizons

Calculates adjusted 5, 21, and 63 trading-day total and benchmark-relative returns.

Assign descriptive phases

Separates leading, improving, weakening, and lagging evidence with stable tie-breaking.

Agent workflow

A bounded call from question to review

1
Choose the fixed focus
Select 1m or 3m without redefining the universe.
2
Check benchmark coverage
Confirm adjusted SPY history before interpreting relative returns.
3
Compare ranking and context
Keep price rotation and options-premium context as separate evidence.

Prompt examples

Questions an agent can route to this tool

"Use Pineify analyze-sector-rotation for 3m and list all eleven phases with coverage."

"Compare 1m sector rotation against SPY and keep missing long-window evidence explicit."

Operator notes

How I review the result

I treat the ranking as historical relative-price evidence, not a sector forecast.

I do not describe options-premium sector flow as ETF subscriptions or redemptions.

Boundaries to keep in the prompt

The universe and benchmark are fixed; custom baskets and arbitrary weighting are not supported.
Missing adjusted history can make a sector or benchmark comparison unavailable.
Phases are descriptive and do not constitute allocation or trading advice.

Pineify MCP provides financial information, code validation, and Journal recordkeeping. It does not provide investment advice, promise returns, send broker orders, or transfer funds. Review timestamps, source fields, code diagnostics, and risk assumptions before acting.

MCP tool family