Palomar Holdings, Inc. research snapshot
PLMR AI stock analysis currently reads Palomar Holdings as a profitable specialty property insurer that has grown revenue at a double-digit rate by focusing on underserved catastrophe-exposed lines such as earthquake, flood, and wind. At the July 12, 2026 data cutoff, PLMR closed at $136.07 on July 10 with an implied market capitalization of about $3.61 billion based on 26.50 million shares outstanding. Trailing twelve month revenue was approximately $980 million and net income was approximately $197 million. Q1 2026 revenue of $278.94 million beat analyst estimates and EPS of $2.31 exceeded the $2.20 consensus. The bull case is continued premium growth in specialty lines, favorable catastrophe experience, and expanding distribution. The bear case is elevated catastrophe losses, increased competition in earthquake markets, adverse reserve development, or a higher cost of reinsurance. This page is for informational use only and is not investment advice.
Current price
$136.07
Market cap
$3.61 billion
AI score
78 / 100
Rating
Fast-growing specialty property insurer focused on earthquake and other catastrophe-exposed lines with strong underwriting margins and double-digit revenue growth
Trend status
Price recently pulled back from the 52-week high of $147.62 and is testing the $134 to $136 support zone, with elevated implied volatility near 41%
Data cutoff (updated weekly)
July 12, 2026
Informational use only. This page is not investment advice.
| Dimension | Conclusion | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Business quality | Palomar earns premiums from earthquake, wind, flood, and other specialty property insurance policies distributed through retail agents, program administrators, and wholesale brokers, focused on underserved catastrophe-exposed markets. | High |
| Moat | Palomar has built underwriting expertise and data analytics for catastrophe-exposed property risks that many standard carriers avoid. Its distribution relationships, proprietary risk models, and reinsurance relationships create a niche. The moat is analytical and relational rather than a hard technology or brand monopoly. | Medium-high |
| Management | CEO Mac Armstrong and the executive team have grown premiums from under $200 million in 2019 to nearly $1 billion in TTM revenue while maintaining profitability and building a diversified specialty platform. Management has executed well on growth and product expansion. | Medium-high |
| Financial trend | TTM revenue was approximately $980 million and TTM net income approximately $197 million through March 2026. Revenue grew at a double-digit compound rate since 2019. Operating income was $56.62 million in Q1 2026, reflecting the seasonal pattern of catastrophe risk exposure. | High for reported data |
| Valuation | At $136.07, the financial_rigor.py calculation gives about 18.29x TTM EPS, 3.85x book value, and 17.90x free cash flow per share with no dividend. The multiple is reasonable for a growth specialty insurer but offers limited margin of safety if premium growth slows or catastrophe losses rise. | High for math, medium for judgment |
| Technical trend | The price recently pulled back from the 52-week high of $147.62 to the current $136.07, testing support near the $134 to $136 area. RSI and momentum signals are neutral to slightly weak after the pullback. A break below $132 would weaken the intermediate-term structure. | Medium |
| Risk level | Medium-high. Key risks include earthquake and catastrophe loss severity, reinsurance availability and cost, pricing cycle softening, reserve inadequacy, competition from larger carriers, regulatory changes, and key-person risk given the concentrated management team. | High |
| AI confidence | High for the data snapshot and transparent scenario math, but medium for forward earnings because catastrophe experience, premium growth, and the valuation multiple are all variable and interdependent. | Medium-high |
| Investment certainty | Medium. The business has a strong growth story and profitable underwriting, but the current price requires continued premium growth and favorable catastrophe experience. A single severe earthquake or wind season could meaningfully change the earnings picture. | Medium |
PLMR AI stock forecast
The PLMR AI stock forecast uses a three-year scenario range rather than a fixed price target. The exact model used $7.44 TTM EPS, growth assumptions of 18%, 12%, and 5%, and terminal P/E assumptions of 22x, 18x, and 14x. It produced about $268.90, $188.10, and $120.60 before dividends. The range is sensitive to premium growth rates, catastrophe loss experience, reinsurance costs, and the valuation multiple.
$240 to $290
More likely if premium growth remains above 15%, catastrophe losses stay within budget, reinsurance costs normalize, the company expands into new specialty lines, and the market rewards the growth story with a 22x multiple. The model point is about $268.90.
$170 to $210
More likely if premium growth moderates to 10-12%, catastrophe exposure is managed with moderate loss experience, distribution expansion continues steadily, and EPS grows near 12% with an 18x multiple. The model point is about $188.10.
$105 to $135
More likely if premium growth slows, a severe catastrophe event causes above-budget losses, reinsurance becomes more expensive or restricted, competition erodes pricing, or the market applies a 14x multiple to slower 5% EPS growth. The model point is about $120.60.
PLMR AI technical analysis
PLMR AI technical analysis shows a pullback from the 52-week high as of the July 12, 2026 cutoff. The July 10 close of $136.07 is below the recent $147.62 high and testing the $134 to $136 support zone. Barchart shows first resistance at $139.63 and first support at $134.09. RSI and momentum indicators are in neutral territory after the decline. A break below $132 would suggest further downside, while a recovery above $140 would re-establish a bullish near-term posture.
| Level | Value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Current price | $136.07 | Barchart and Google Finance closing quote for July 10, 2026. After-hours trading was flat at the same level. |
| Near support | $134 to $136 | The July 8 to July 10 trading range tested the $134 to $136 area. Barchart first support is at $134.09. This is a chart reference, not a guaranteed floor. |
| Secondary support | $128 to $132 | Barchart second support is at $132.10 and third support at $128.55. A move to this area would represent a deeper pullback from the 52-week high. |
| Near resistance | $139 to $141 | Barchart first resistance is at $139.63. The July 10 open was $139.99 and the high was $141.20, so this zone represents recent overhead supply. |
| Key resistance | $143 to $148 | Barchart second resistance is at $143.18 and the 52-week high is $147.62. This is the major resistance zone. A breakout above $148 would be a significant technical development. |
| Momentum | 1-month change +20.05%; 3-month change +6.47% | The stock rallied strongly over the past month but has given back some gains. Momentum is mixed after the recent pullback from the 52-week high. |
| Volume | 338,476 on July 10; 313,270 20-day average | The July 10 session volume of about 338K was above the 20-day average of 313K, indicating elevated participation during the pullback. |
| Volatility | 5-year beta 0.41; implied volatility 41.31% | Beta is well below 1.0, but the implied volatility of 41% reflects the market pricing significant event risk around earnings and catastrophe seasons. |
| Invalidation | Sustained close below $128 | A break below the $128 area would weaken the intermediate-term structure. A single large catastrophe loss or a significant earnings miss would invalidate the fundamental setup sooner than any technical level. |
PLMR AI trading strategy
The PLMR AI trading strategy below is a rules-based research framework, not personalized advice. It combines price confirmation with premium growth, catastrophe loss experience, reinsurance costs, and valuation data because a strong chart can fail when insurance operating inputs change.
Watch whether PLMR holds the $134 to $136 support area and recovers above $140 with volume. Confirm the move with premium growth trends, catastrophe loss ratios, and the next quarterly earnings release. The stock tends to trade on catastrophe risk perception and earnings surprises.
A failed recovery followed by a close below $132 should reduce confidence. Treat a sustained close below $128 as a deeper technical invalidation and size for event risk around earnings and peak catastrophe season.
A deeper pullback toward the $128 to $132 area can become a watchlist condition if premium growth remains above 10%, the loss ratio stays within budget, and the company continues to expand its specialty product lines.
Do not treat the low beta or analyst price targets as a floor. Recheck premium growth, loss ratios, and the valuation multiple before assuming a decline is temporary.
Track gross written premium growth, combined ratio, catastrophe loss ratio, reserve development, reinsurance cost and availability, new product and distribution expansion, employee and agent count, and book value per share growth.
Override a bullish chart signal if premium growth slows meaningfully, the combined ratio deteriorates due to catastrophe losses, reinsurance costs rise materially, or management guidance is reduced.
Investment research summary
Palomar is a specialty property insurer that earns premiums by insuring risks that standard carriers avoid - primarily earthquake, but also wind, flood, and other catastrophe-exposed property. Customers pay for protection in high-risk areas, and Palomar profits when its underwriting models correctly price those risks. The model is recurring through policy renewals, but results are inherently lumpy due to catastrophe exposure.
The moat is built from proprietary risk models, deep underwriting expertise in catastrophe-exposed property, established distribution relationships with agents and program administrators, access to reinsurance markets, and a track record of profitable growth since 2013. The moat can narrow if larger carriers decide to compete aggressively in earthquake and specialty lines, or if the company suffers a string of adverse catastrophe losses that impair its underwriting confidence or reinsurance relationships.
The thesis can fail through a severe earthquake or wind season that produces above-budget losses, a sustained soft market that compresses premium rates, rising reinsurance costs that reduce margin, reserve inadequacy from prior accident years, loss of key underwriting talent, or management missteps in expanding beyond its core competency. The key question is whether the recent growth trajectory is durable or reflects favorable catastrophe experience that will not persist.
CEO Mac Armstrong has led Palomar since its founding in 2013, growing the company from a startup to a publicly traded specialty insurer with nearly $1 billion in annual premiums. Management has focused on disciplined underwriting, product diversification, and distribution expansion. The key test is whether the company can maintain underwriting discipline while growing rapidly and expanding into newer specialty lines where it has less experience.
The specialty property insurance market benefits from increasing awareness of natural catastrophe risk, population growth in catastrophe-exposed areas, and a hard market pricing cycle in many property lines. Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of certain weather events, creating both demand for insurance and uncertainty about loss costs. The California earthquake insurance market, where Palomar is a leading player, has structural growth drivers from regulatory requirements and increasing risk awareness.
At $136.07, the exact valuation check gave 18.29x TTM EPS, 3.85x book value, 17.90x free cash flow per share, and no dividend. The three-scenario model produced about $268.90, $188.10, and $120.60 after three years. The base case is above the current quote, but the margin of safety is modest because the earnings base can change significantly depending on catastrophe loss experience in any given year.
Source-backed data
Every metric below includes a source and last verification date.
| Metric | Value | Source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLMR closing price | $136.07 on July 10, 2026 | Barchart and Google Finance closing quote | July 12, 2026 |
| Market capitalization | $3.606 billion from $136.07 x 26.50 million shares | financial_rigor.py calculation using Barchart shares data | July 12, 2026 |
| Shares outstanding | 26.50 million as of most recent filing | Barchart fundamentals and Google Finance | July 12, 2026 |
| TTM Revenue (through Mar 2026) | Approximately $980 million; Q1 2026 revenue was $278.94 million | Google Finance quarterly income statement data | July 12, 2026 |
| TTM Net Income (through Mar 2026) | Approximately $197.10 million; Q1 2026 net income was $42.95 million | Google Finance quarterly income statement data | July 12, 2026 |
| Q1 2026 results | $278.94 million revenue, $42.95 million net income, $2.31 diluted EPS | Google Finance and Barchart | July 12, 2026 |
| Quarterly EPS trend | Q1 2026 $2.31, Q4 2025 $2.24, Q3 2025 $2.01, Q2 2025 $1.76 | Google Finance quarterly data | July 12, 2026 |
| Cash on balance sheet | Exact cash figure not retrieved; Barchart reports no dividend and positive operating cash flow | Barchart fundamentals | July 12, 2026 |
| Valuation ratios | 18.29x P/E, 3.85x P/B, 17.90x P/FCF, 5.59% FCF yield, and no dividend from exact verification inputs | financial_rigor.py verify-valuation using Barchart and Google Finance TTM inputs | July 12, 2026 |
| Technical snapshot | 52-week high $147.62, 52-week low $100.81, beta 0.41, implied volatility 41.31%, and 313,270 average volume | Barchart and Google Finance | July 11, 2026 |
| Analyst consensus | Moderate Buy from 10 analysts; average price target $153.60 (range $132 to $168) | Barchart analyst ratings and Google Finance analyst page | July 12, 2026 |
| Price performance | 1-month +20.05%, 3-month +6.47%, 52-week -1.83% | Barchart price performance data | July 12, 2026 |
| Industry context | Specialty property and casualty insurance; SIC-6331 Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance | Barchart industry classification | July 12, 2026 |
| Revenue cross-validation note | Barchart reported $875.97M annual sales (likely FY2025) while Google Finance quarterly data implies $980.27M TTM through Mar 2026. The difference is due to fiscal year vs TTM period. | Barchart and Google Finance | July 12, 2026 |
This PLMR AI stock analysis page is an informational research tool only. It is not investment advice, tax advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Forecast ranges are scenarios based on public data available as of July 12, 2026 and may be wrong if premium growth, catastrophe loss experience, reinsurance costs, reserve development, interest rates, regulation, competition, or market valuation change.
Design trading strategies visually with 10+ indicators. Set entry/exit conditions and risk management, then generate Pine Script code with no coding required.
Filter and discover stocks based on market cap, dividend yield, P/E ratio, sector, and more. Screen thousands of stocks with real-time data.
Smart AI-driven stock selection with fundamental screening, analyst estimates, and key metrics. Filter by P/E, market cap, dividends, and more.
