How much do SCHG and QQQM overlap?

The weighted-overlap result uses the smaller portfolio weight for each reliably matched shared holding. Review the data timestamp and coverage states with the percentage.

Is SCHG or QQQM more diversified?

Diversification cannot be decided from the shared-holding count alone. Compare unique holdings, concentration, sector, country, and market-cap-style exposure together.

Should I own both SCHG and QQQM?

That depends on whether the duplicated exposure is intentional. The 50/50 portfolio view shows how much of a combined allocation is shared, but it is not personalized investment advice.

How many holdings do SCHG and QQQM share?

SCHG and QQQM share 47 reliably matched holdings in the stored snapshots. Check both provider dates and identified coverage before treating the count as complete.

Can AI predict whether SCHG or QQQM will perform better?

No. AI cannot predict whether SCHG or QQQM will perform better. This page measures current holdings exposure and does not compare future returns or recommend a winner.

ETF Overlap Tool

SCHG vs QQQM ETF Overlap

Snapshot overlap answer

SCHG and QQQM share 47 matched holdings in the stored snapshots. Their weighted holdings overlap is 58.8%. SCHG has 66.7% in common holdings, while QQQM has 63.9%. The holdings dates are Jul 28, 2026 and Jul 29, 2026.

Compare ETF holdings

Enter two different ETF tickers. The base comparison uses a 50% and 50% model, which you can change after the result loads.

Examples: VOO and VTI, QQQ and VGT, or SCHD and VYM.

Data dates and coverage

Complete

Each ETF keeps its own FMP update time. Pineify does not replace different timestamps with a single date. Result retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.

SCHG: Updated Jul 28, 2026, 10:07 PM UTC; Identified coverage: 100.0%; Positive long weight: 100.0%. Identified long: 100.0%.; Signed source weight: 100.0%. Unmatched long: 0.0%.
QQQM: Updated Jul 29, 2026, 03:07 AM UTC; Identified coverage: 99.8%; Positive long weight: 100.1%. Identified long: 100.0%.; Signed source weight: 100.0%. Unmatched long: 0.2%.; Excluded negative weight: 0.1%.

Shared holdings: 47; Resolved holding identities present in both ETF snapshots.
Weighted overlap: 58.8%; Sum of the smaller weight for each shared holding.
SCHG common exposure: 66.7%; Share of SCHG invested in holdings that also appear in QQQM.
QQQM common exposure: 63.9%; Share of QQQM invested in holdings that also appear in SCHG.

Top shared holdings

Ranked by the smaller weight contributed by the two ETFs.

Complete

Shared holdings for SCHG and QQQM
Holding	SCHG weight	QQQM weight	Overlap slice
AAPLAPPLE INC	10.54%	8.42%	8.42%
NVDANVIDIA CORP	10.07%	8.04%	8.04%
MSFTMICROSOFT CORP	6.16%	4.93%	4.93%
AMZNAMAZON COM INC	4.77%	4.19%	4.19%
GOOGLALPHABET INC CLASS A	4.13%	3.28%	3.28%
GOOGALPHABET INC CLASS C	3.32%	3.06%	3.06%
AVGOBROADCOM INC	3.81%	3.05%	3.05%
METAMETA PLATFORMS INC CLASS A	2.75%	2.96%	2.75%
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC	2.42%	3.45%	2.42%
TSLATESLA INC	2.10%	2.59%	2.10%
COSTCOSTCO WHOLESALE CORP	1.75%	2.00%	1.75%
NFLXNETFLIX INC	1.24%	1.42%	1.24%
PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC CLASS A	1.16%	1.32%	1.16%
PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INC	1.05%	1.21%	1.05%
KLACKLA CORP	1.01%	1.16%	1.01%

Top unique holdings

These resolved holdings appear on one side of the current snapshots, not both.

Unique to SCHG

LLYELI LILLY3.27%
VVISA INC CLASS A2.48%
MAMASTERCARD INC CLASS A1.85%
UNHUNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC1.59%
GEGE AEROSPACE1.54%
GEVGE VERNOVA INC1.03%
TMOTHERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC0.87%
ANETARISTA NETWORKS INC0.71%
DISWALT DISNEY0.70%
BLKBLACKROCK INC0.64%

Unique to QQQM

MUMicron Technology Inc4.31%
WMTWalmart Inc2.57%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc2.12%
INTCIntel Corp2.02%
AMATApplied Materials Inc1.76%
LRCXLam Research Corp1.57%
TXNTexas Instruments Inc1.17%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp1.04%
AMGNAmgen Inc0.99%
PEPPepsiCo Inc0.91%

Sector overlap

Sector weights are compared by normalized provider labels. Unknown weight is not reassigned.

78.1%Complete

SCHG classification coverage: Classified ratio: 100.0%. Unknown weight: 0.0%.
QQQM classification coverage: Classified ratio: 100.0%. Unknown weight: 0.0%.

Sector overlap for SCHG and QQQM
Bucket	SCHG	QQQM	Overlap
Information Technology	44.04%	60.93%	44.04%
Communication Services	14.05%	13.07%	13.07%
Consumer Discretionary	11.22%	10.68%	10.68%
Health Care	9.95%	3.56%	3.56%
Industrials	7.61%	2.70%	2.70%
Consumer Staples	1.89%	6.25%	1.89%
Materials	1.60%	1.04%	1.04%
Utilities	0.45%	1.14%	0.45%
Energy	0.85%	0.45%	0.45%
Financials	7.74%	0.17%	0.17%
Cash & Others	0.03%	0.01%	0.01%
Real Estate	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%

Country overlap

Country exposure uses the current provider classification for each ETF.

95.6%Complete

SCHG classification coverage: Classified ratio: 100.0%. Unknown weight: 0.0%.
QQQM classification coverage: Classified ratio: 100.0%. Unknown weight: 0.0%.

Country overlap for SCHG and QQQM
Bucket	SCHG	QQQM	Overlap
United States	98.07%	94.22%	94.22%
United Kingdom	1.03%	1.81%	1.03%
Ireland	0.67%	0.25%	0.25%
Canada	0.05%	0.80%	0.05%
Netherlands	0.02%	1.45%	0.02%
Singapore	0.00%	0.88%	0.00%
Uruguay	0.00%	0.42%	0.00%
Cayman Islands	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%
Other	0.00%	0.15%	0.00%

Market-cap style overlap

Applicable equity holdings are grouped by Pineify v1 market-cap thresholds. Bonds, cash, and derivatives are excluded.

98.9%Complete

SCHG classification coverage: Classified ratio: 99.9%. Unknown weight: 0.1%.
QQQM classification coverage: Classified ratio: 99.3%. Unknown weight: 0.7%.

Market-cap style overlap for SCHG and QQQM
Bucket	SCHG	QQQM	Overlap
Large cap	99.37%	98.93%	98.93%
Unclassified	0.05%	0.68%	0.00%
Mid cap	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%
Small cap	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%

Model your whole-portfolio exposure

Enter each ETF as a share of the whole portfolio. Pineify keeps any remainder unmodeled and does not rescale the inputs.

SCHG allocation (%)QQQM allocation (%)

0% remains outside this two-ETF model.

Shared exposure: 65.3%; Combined exposure to holdings present in both ETFs.
Duplicate slice: 29.4%; The smaller scaled position for every shared holding.
Unmodeled remainder: 0.0%; Portfolio weight outside the two entered ETFs.

Method

Weighted overlap is the sum of the smaller holding weight for every matched security.
Pineify retains valid ISIN, CUSIP, and symbol aliases. Matching proceeds in stages and only accepts unique, non-conflicting identities. Names are not fuzzy matched.
Common exposure is calculated separately for each ETF. It is not the same metric as weighted overlap.
Negative weights are reported separately and excluded from the long-only overlap calculation.
Market-cap style uses Pineify methodology v1: small below $2 billion, mid from $2 billion to below $10 billion, and large at $10 billion or more. Market-cap data older than seven days is stale and the affected weight remains unclassified.

Methodology version: holdings-overlap-v1

Sources and warnings

FMP etf-holdings for SCHGProvider time: Jul 28, 2026, 10:07 PM UTC. Retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.
FMP etf-info for SCHGProvider time: Jul 30, 2026, 04:34 AM UTC. Retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.
FMP etf-sector-weightings for SCHGProvider time: No provider timestamp. Retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.
FMP etf-country-weightings for SCHGProvider time: No provider timestamp. Retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.
FMP etf-holdings for QQQMProvider time: Jul 29, 2026, 03:07 AM UTC. Retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.
FMP etf-info for QQQMProvider time: Jul 30, 2026, 03:10 AM UTC. Retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.
FMP etf-sector-weightings for QQQMProvider time: No provider timestamp. Retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.
FMP etf-country-weightings for QQQMProvider time: No provider timestamp. Retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.
FMP market-capitalization-batchProvider time: No provider timestamp. Retrieved Jul 30, 2026, 05:02 AM UTC.

Data notes

Negative holding weight is reported separately and excluded from long-only overlap.
Some positive holding weight did not have a reliable security identity.
Holding tables show the highest-weight rows; calculations use every resolved holding.
2 market-cap observations were too old for current style classification.
1 applicable symbols did not have a current market-cap observation.
The two ETF holdings snapshots have different FMP update times.

What this SCHG and QQQM result means

Holding count and weight answer different questions

The shared count shows how many resolved holding identities appear on both sides. Weighted overlap shows how much of the smaller position lines up for each shared security.

This is not a performance comparison

The page does not compare fees, liquidity, tracking error, taxes, or historical returns. Use those factors in a separate fund review before making an investment decision.

Published pair pages

Open the ETF Overlap tool

SCHG / VUGSCHG vs VUG ETF OverlapInspect shared holdings and duplicate exposure for this pair.QQQ / QQQMQQQ vs QQQM ETF OverlapInspect shared holdings and duplicate exposure for this pair.QQQM / VUGQQQM vs VUG ETF OverlapInspect shared holdings and duplicate exposure for this pair.QQQM / VGTQQQM vs VGT ETF OverlapInspect shared holdings and duplicate exposure for this pair.

ETF overlap questions

A next step after overlap

Put the duplicate exposure in research context

ETF overlap explains portfolio composition. Finance Agent can help you inspect the funds, sectors, and holdings behind the result. It does not turn overlap into a buy or sell recommendation.

Research with Finance Agent Open portfolio analysis

Pineify ETF Overlap is an information tool, not investment advice. The analysis does not compare fees, liquidity, past performance, or expected returns, and it does not recommend one ETF over another. Data can be incomplete or delayed. No tool or AI system can predict ETF prices or guarantee a return.