Unilever PLC research snapshot
UL AI stock analysis currently reads Unilever PLC as a global consumer staples franchise with brands such as Dove, Vaseline, Rexona, Hellmann's, Knorr, Comfort, and Persil, broad distribution, and recurring daily-use demand. UL closed at $63.41 on July 31, 2026, with a reported market capitalization of $137.48 billion. On July 28, 2026, Unilever reported volume-led H1 2026 results, with underlying sales growth of 4.8%, the strongest quarterly volume performance since 2010, underlying operating margin expansion of 10 basis points to 20.3%, and a raised full-year outlook. The caution is that pricing is expected to lead growth in the second half, commodity inflation near EUR 850 million, currency, Foods share losses, and the planned Foods combination with McCormick still carry execution risk. This is informational analysis, not investment advice.
Current price
$63.41 July 31, 2026 close
Market cap
$137.48 billion reported, verified near $136.3 billion using the $63.41 close and 2.15 billion shares outstanding
AI score
72 / 100
Rating
Global consumer staples franchise with improved volume-led momentum and a raised full-year outlook, balanced by input-cost inflation, currency, Foods weakness, and a less discounted valuation
Trend status
Price is above the 50-day average near $59.85 but sits near the 200-day average near $63.73 after a post-earnings spike, so the trend needs follow-through and volume confirmation
Data cutoff (updated monthly)
August 4, 2026
Informational use only. This page is not investment advice.
| Dimension | Conclusion | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Business quality | Unilever sells daily-use beauty, personal care, home care, and food products through global brands, local distribution, and repeat household demand, with H1 2026 growth led by volume across its power brands. | High |
| Moat | Brand trust, shelf space, distribution, advertising scale, formulation know-how, and emerging-market reach support pricing and repeat purchase, but many categories face credible private-label and local-brand alternatives, as shown by U.S. condiment share losses. | Medium-high |
| Management | CEO Fernando Fernandez is executing fewer, larger power brands, a social-first and AI-enabled marketing model, productivity savings, portfolio reshaping, dividends, and buybacks. The test is whether the Foods and McCormick combination and acquisitions improve returns rather than add complexity. | Medium-high |
| Financial trend | FY2025 turnover was EUR 50.503 billion, down 3.8%. H1 2026 turnover rose 0.5% to EUR 25.6 billion, underlying sales grew 4.8% with volume up 4.2%, underlying operating margin expanded 10 basis points to 20.3%, and free cash flow was EUR 1.5 billion. | High |
| Valuation | At $63.41, the trailing PE was near 12.98x, the forward PE near 16.6x, price to FCF near 16.4x, and the dividend yield near 3.6%. The consensus price target was $73.65, about 16% above the close. | Medium |
| Technical trend | The July 31 price was above the 50-day average near $59.85 and near the 200-day average near $63.73 after a post-earnings spike to about $67. RSI near 55 leaves room for either trend repair or consolidation. | Medium |
| Risk level | Key risks are volume sensitivity as pricing returns, private-label and Foods share losses, commodity and packaging costs, currency, emerging-market volatility, portfolio and transaction execution, leverage, and valuation compression. | Medium-high |
| AI confidence | Current reported financial data is well supported. Scenario ranges are conditional estimates rather than predictions. | High data confidence |
| Investment certainty | UL appears more durable than high-growth, high-beta equities, but return certainty remains moderate because low-growth staples can underperform when operational or portfolio assumptions miss. | Medium |
UL AI stock forecast
The UL AI stock forecast uses scenario math, not a price promise. Using the July 31, 2026 close of $63.41, TTM EPS near $4.83, and a three-year model audited with financial_rigor.py, the bearish, base, and bullish references are near $43, $67, and $91 before dividends. Outcomes depend on volume momentum, pricing, margin delivery, currency, commodity costs, Foods transaction execution, and the earnings multiple investors assign to Unilever.
$86 to $96
More likely if underlying sales growth stays in the 4% to 6% range with consistent volume, pricing rebuilds in the second half, margins expand modestly, power brands keep gaining share, the Foods and McCormick combination creates value, and investors apply about 15x earnings.
$63 to $72
More likely if EPS compounds near 5% annually, currency headwinds ease, productivity offsets normal cost inflation, dividend and buybacks continue, and the market keeps UL near 12x earnings.
$40 to $47
More likely if volumes weaken once pricing returns, private label and Foods gain share, commodity or FX pressure outpaces pricing, the McCormick combination is delayed or dilutive, or the market re-rates UL closer to 9x earnings.
UL AI technical analysis
UL AI technical analysis uses data available at the August 2026 cutoff. StockAnalysis showed a July 31 close of $63.41, a 50-day moving average of $59.85, a 200-day moving average of $63.73, RSI of 55.05, average 20-day volume of about 4.96 million shares, and a 52-week range of $54.75 to $74.98. After the July 28 earnings release the ADR traded as high as about $67 before fading back toward the 200-day area, so the setup is a recovery that still needs follow-through.
| Level | Value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Current price | $63.41 | NYSE close on July 31, 2026 reported by StockAnalysis. |
| Immediate support | $59.85 | StockAnalysis reported the 50-day moving average near this level. A sustained break below it would weaken the recovery setup. |
| Deeper support | $54.75 to $57 | This band is anchored by the reported 52-week low and is a higher-risk mean-reversion reference, not a guaranteed floor. |
| Near resistance | $65 to $67 | The July 30 close near $65.27 and the post-earnings high near $67.05 form the first confirmation zone for trend followers. |
| Higher resistance | $74.98 to $75 | This zone is anchored by the reported 52-week high and would require materially stronger earnings confidence. |
| Moving averages | 50-day near $59.85, 200-day near $63.73 | Price above the 50-day average is constructive. Reclaiming and holding the 200-day average would strengthen the longer trend. |
| Momentum | RSI 55.05 | RSI is constructive but not a standalone signal. It should be read with price, volume, earnings, and guidance. |
| Volume and volatility | 20-day average volume 4.96 million, beta 0.45 | Lower beta does not remove gap risk around earnings, portfolio announcements, currency moves, or wider consumer-staples repricing. |
| Invalidation | Sustained close below $58 to $59 | A break below the 50-day average alongside weaker volume or guidance would invalidate a simple trend-recovery thesis. |
UL AI trading strategy
This UL AI trading strategy is a rules-based research framework, not personal advice. Pair price action with underlying sales growth, volume and price mix, power brand performance, underlying operating margin, free cash flow, net debt, dividend coverage, buyback execution, Foods transaction milestones, commodity costs, currency, and private-label trends.
Watch for UL to hold above the 50-day average near $59.85, reclaim and hold the 200-day average near $63.73 on improving volume, and continue to report volume-led underlying growth and margin delivery.
A sustained close below $58, weaker underlying volume, margin pressure, or a negative change in transaction economics should reduce trend-following confidence.
If UL pulls back toward the $57 to $60 range while brand health, free cash flow, and capital returns remain intact, compare the entry price with the audited base scenario and consumer-staples peers such as PG, CL, and KMB.
Do not assume a lower price is attractive if private label, cost inflation, currency, debt, or portfolio execution is changing normalized earnings power.
Track group and segment underlying sales growth, volume vs price, power brands, underlying operating margin, free cash flow, net debt, dividends, buybacks, commodity costs, currency, and McCormick Foods transaction milestones.
Position size should reflect that consumer staples earnings are steadier than cyclicals, not immune to execution and valuation risk.
Investment research summary
Customers pay Unilever for trusted, convenient daily-use products across personal care, beauty, home care, and foods. The model depends on brand relevance, distribution availability, product performance, and repeat purchase across developed and emerging markets, with power brands now accounting for 78% of turnover.
The moat is built on brands, retail relationships, route-to-market scale, marketing reach, consumer insight, formulation, procurement scale, and local execution. It is durable but not absolute because shelf-space competition and private labels can pressure price and volume, as the U.S. condiment share losses show.
The thesis fails if volume slows once pricing returns, private labels gain share, commodity and packaging costs outrun savings, emerging markets weaken, the Foods and McCormick transaction destroys value, or debt limits capital-return flexibility.
Fernando Fernandez is focusing the portfolio on fewer, larger power brands while pursuing a social-first and AI-enabled marketing model, productivity, targeted acquisitions, divestments, dividends, and buybacks. The capital-allocation question is whether these actions improve returns on capital after execution costs and separation complexity.
Consumer staples benefit from population growth, premium beauty and wellbeing demand, household penetration in emerging markets, and retailer distribution. The offsets are mature-market growth, local competition, private labels, sustainability costs, FX, and changing consumer preferences.
At $63.41, UL trades near 13.0x trailing earnings and 16.4x free cash flow, with a 3.6% dividend yield. The base scenario is above the reference price, but the margin of safety depends on volume-led growth, pricing delivery, and portfolio execution rather than a claim of precise intrinsic value.
Source-backed data
Every metric below includes a source and last verification date.
| Metric | Value | Source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current price and share count | $63.41 close on July 31, 2026 and 2.15 billion shares outstanding | StockAnalysis UL overview and statistics | August 2, 2026 |
| Market capitalization verification | $137.48 billion reported; $136.33 billion computed as $63.41 x 2.15 billion shares, a 0.84% difference within the disclosed share-definition and timing tolerance | StockAnalysis UL statistics and Pineify financial_rigor.py | August 2, 2026 |
| H1 2026 turnover and growth | EUR 25.6 billion, up 0.5%, with underlying sales growth of 4.8% (4.2% volume, 0.6% price) and a 4.9% currency headwind | Unilever Q2/H1 2026 results via MarketBeat and Motley Fool transcript | August 2, 2026 |
| Q2 2026 underlying sales | Underlying sales growth of 5.8%, with 5.5% from volume, the best quarterly volume performance since 2010; power brands grew 6.9% in Q2 and 6.0% in H1 | Unilever Q2/H1 2026 earnings call transcript via Motley Fool | August 2, 2026 |
| H1 2026 margin, profit, and EPS | Underlying operating margin 20.3%, up 10 basis points; underlying operating profit EUR 5.2 billion, up 0.9%; underlying EPS EUR 1.61, up 2.4% | Unilever Q2/H1 2026 results via MarketBeat and Motley Fool | August 2, 2026 |
| H1 2026 free cash flow | EUR 1.5 billion, up EUR 500 million year over year | Unilever Q2/H1 2026 results via MarketBeat | August 2, 2026 |
| FY2026 outlook | Underlying sales growth upgraded to 4% to 6% with around 3% volume for the year; H2 underlying sales growth of 4% to 5% led by pricing; currency headwind near 3% for the year | Unilever Q2/H1 2026 results via MarketBeat | August 2, 2026 |
| Capital allocation and portfolio actions | Q2 dividend raised 3%; EUR 1.5 billion buyback completed in June 2026; EUR 6 billion of buybacks planned between 2026 and 2029; Grüns acquired in June 2026; Foods combination with McCormick valued near $65 billion expected to complete in 2027 | Unilever Q2/H1 2026 results via MarketBeat and Reuters | August 2, 2026 |
| FY2025 financials | Revenue EUR 50.503 billion, down 3.8%; operating income EUR 9.037 billion; net income EUR 9.469 billion; EPS EUR 4.32 | StockAnalysis UL financials | August 2, 2026 |
| Balance sheet June 30, 2026 | Cash and short-term investments EUR 6.048 billion, total debt EUR 32.110 billion, net debt EUR 26.062 billion | StockAnalysis UL balance sheet | August 2, 2026 |
| Technical indicators | 50-day moving average $59.85, 200-day moving average $63.73, RSI 55.05, beta 0.45, 52-week range $54.75 to $74.98, and 20-day average volume near 4.96 million shares | StockAnalysis UL statistics | August 2, 2026 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy consensus from 5 analysts with an average price target of $73.65, a low of $69.76, and a high of $76.95; BofA raised its target to $76 and TD Cowen to $76 in late July 2026 | StockAnalysis UL forecast, S&P Global and TipRanks | August 2, 2026 |
This UL AI stock analysis is an informational research tool, not investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation. Forecasts are scenario estimates based on available data and assumptions. They can be wrong, and market prices can change quickly. Consider independent research and a qualified financial professional before making an investment decision.
Design trading strategies visually with 10+ indicators. Set entry/exit conditions and risk management, then generate Pine Script code with no coding required.
Filter and discover stocks based on market cap, dividend yield, P/E ratio, sector, and more. Screen thousands of stocks with real-time data.
Smart AI-driven stock selection with fundamental screening, analyst estimates, and key metrics. Filter by P/E, market cap, dividends, and more.
